THE UNCERTAINTY PRINCIPLE,
Part 2
“It's Not for You to Know”
The Orthodox Church
believes in the baptism of children and accepts them into full membership of
the Church, including the taking of Holy Communion, from the very beginning. I
shall be discussing some of the implications of this in a later blog but it
also has relevance to the question of doubt and agnosticism. Children are full
members of the Church and yet how can a three-year-old be expected to
understand the Holy Trinity? It follows, then, that it cannot be necessary for
our salvation that we understand every aspect of Orthodox theology. As we grow
older, of course, we understand more but even the greatest intellects among us
remain mere infants from the perspective of eternity. This is not to say that
we shouldn't use our God-given brains to seek to make sense of the world but we
should never forget that we are still 'looking through a glass darkly.'
As I have explored the
rich landscape of Orthodox thought, I have sometimes been surprised to find that the 'uncertainty
principle' is actually at the heart of much mainstream Orthodox belief. Some of
the greatest Orthodox theologians have argued that we can never understand what
God is and can only attempt to define Him by what He is not. Others
maintain that even this is beyond human understanding and we can only know God
through Christ. Well, that's all a bit deep and I certainly don't intend to go
into details about this 'apophatic' theology; if this interests you, 'The
Orthodox Way' by Metropolitan Kallistos contains a reasonably accessible approach to the
subject, as does Vladimir Lossky's 'The Mystical Theology of the Eastern
Church.' However, even in the basic beliefs we all profess, Orthodoxy accepts
that many ‘details’ of Christian faith are better left unexplored. The Church
maintains an attitude of reverent and agnostic reticence towards such beliefs
as the Assumption of the Virgin Mary or exactly what happens after death. The
former, as Metropolitan Kallistos writes, “is not so much an object of faith as
a foundation of our hope, a fruit of faith, ripened in Tradition. Let us
therefore keep silence, and let us not try to dogmatize about the supreme glory
of the Mother of God.”
C.S. Lewis argues that
even what exactly happened at the Crucifixion cannot be (and perhaps should not
be) the object of too much detailed analysis. “We believe that the death of
Christ is just that point in history at which something absolutely unimaginable
from outside shows through into our own world. And if we cannot picture even
the atoms of which our own world is built, of course we are not going to be
able to picture this. Indeed, if we found that we could fully understand it,
that very fact would show it was not what it professes to be – the inconceivable,
the uncreated, the thing beyond nature, striking down into nature like
lightning. You may ask what good it will be to us if we do not understand it.
But that is easily answered. A man can eat his dinner without understanding
exactly how food nourishes him. A man can accept what Christ has done without
knowing how it works.”
In “The Orthodox Church,”
Metropolitan Kallistos cites a timely reminder of how we should beware of
probing too deeply: “When St. Antony of Egypt was once worrying about divine
providence, a voice came to him, saying: ‘Antony, attend to yourself; for these
are the judgements of God, and it is not for you to know them.’” I'm not saying
that speculation, study, theology and analysis of one's faith is wrong. I do it
all the time. It should, however, be kept in perspective. Whatever our natural
desire for clear answers and certainty, maybe it's better, as Christmas
approaches, to consider the shepherds of Bethlehem. It's unlikely that any of
them understood the concepts of the Holy Trinity, the Incarnation or the Virgin
Birth; they just went and saw and “returned rejoicing and glorifying God.”
Next week: Looking at my
programme for future blogs, I notice that the next one due is on the theme of
the Last Judgement!! Perhaps this might be a bit gloomy for the week before
Christmas so, in the words of TV cooks everywhere, next week I will be
presenting “one I prepared earlier.” On the other hand, if the predictions of
the end of the world on Friday come true, my original posting might have been
very appropriate, if a touch late!
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please feel free to give feedback whether positive or negative. It seems that the comment box won't work unless you complete the Comment as... box. I don't understand all the settings but suggest you choose anonymous and put your name in the text (unless you really do want to be anonymous!) Name + URL (email address) should also work. Due to increasing Spam comments, I've had to introduce word recognition (CAPTCHA) but don't let that put you off.